<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 95 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13235</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of interest on the term loan was upheld as legally sound and based on the evidence presented, in accordance with relevant legal precedents. The Commissioner&#039;s request for a reference on the issue was rejected, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s ruling in favor of the respondent-assessee&#039;s claim under sections 36(1)(iii) and 57(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 14:56:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 95 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13235</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of interest on the term loan was upheld as legally sound and based on the evidence presented, in accordance with relevant legal precedents. The Commissioner&#039;s request for a reference on the issue was rejected, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s ruling in favor of the respondent-assessee&#039;s claim under sections 36(1)(iii) and 57(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>