https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361296 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the confirmed demand on account of availing Cenvat Credit, duty demand, and penalty imposition. It was found that the goods cleared under job-work challan to another unit had duty paid at that unit, creating a revenue-neutral situation. Citing precedents, the Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked due to the absence of malafide intent, ultimately allowing the appeals. en-us Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jun 2018 10:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361296 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the confirmed demand on account of availing Cenvat Credit, duty demand, and penalty imposition. It was found that the goods cleared under job-work challan to another unit had duty paid at that unit, creating a revenue-neutral situation. Citing precedents, the Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked due to the absence of malafide intent, ultimately allowing the appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361296