<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 121 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361294</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Cenvat Credit for the appellants in a case involving denial of credit on various goods due to procedural discrepancies and lack of conclusive evidence. The denial of credit was deemed unjustified as the Revenue&#039;s reliance on presumptions and inadequate investigation was highlighted. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, no demand was confirmed against the appellants, and no penalties were imposed, leading to the allowance of the appeals with any necessary consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 121 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361294</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Cenvat Credit for the appellants in a case involving denial of credit on various goods due to procedural discrepancies and lack of conclusive evidence. The denial of credit was deemed unjustified as the Revenue&#039;s reliance on presumptions and inadequate investigation was highlighted. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, no demand was confirmed against the appellants, and no penalties were imposed, leading to the allowance of the appeals with any necessary consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>