<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 120 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361293</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the duty demand for free quantity supplied and the admissibility of discounts for deduction from the transaction value. It was found that the free supplies were given as quantity discounts and were part of a trade strategy, supported by relevant circulars and judicial precedents. The discounts were considered admissible for deduction under the Central Excise Act, 1944, based on commercial considerations and trade practices, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 10:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 120 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361293</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the duty demand for free quantity supplied and the admissibility of discounts for deduction from the transaction value. It was found that the free supplies were given as quantity discounts and were part of a trade strategy, supported by relevant circulars and judicial precedents. The discounts were considered admissible for deduction under the Central Excise Act, 1944, based on commercial considerations and trade practices, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>