<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1382 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273092</link>
    <description>Expenditure incurred for employee welfare, energy conservation and renewable energy promotion, including State Renewal Fund, Energy Conservation Fund, IEC, rural electrification, biomass study and publicity, was treated as allowable business deduction where a direct business nexus and genuineness were established. Employees&#039; PF and ESI contributions deposited before the due date of filing the return were regarded as allowable. Extension and cancellation fees were not brought to tax on accrual where receipt depended on further action and no real accrual was certain. For section 80IA(4), receipts linked directly to power generation shortfall were treated as eligible, while carbon financial instrument receipts were not; common employee and administrative expenses were required to be apportioned to eligible units.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 07:54:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1382 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273092</link>
      <description>Expenditure incurred for employee welfare, energy conservation and renewable energy promotion, including State Renewal Fund, Energy Conservation Fund, IEC, rural electrification, biomass study and publicity, was treated as allowable business deduction where a direct business nexus and genuineness were established. Employees&#039; PF and ESI contributions deposited before the due date of filing the return were regarded as allowable. Extension and cancellation fees were not brought to tax on accrual where receipt depended on further action and no real accrual was certain. For section 80IA(4), receipts linked directly to power generation shortfall were treated as eligible, while carbon financial instrument receipts were not; common employee and administrative expenses were required to be apportioned to eligible units.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>