<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 138 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13231</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of 100% depreciation claims on leased bottles, concluding the transactions were financial arrangements, not genuine leases. It acted within its jurisdiction under Section 254(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to examine lease deeds and ascertain the true nature of transactions. The appeal was dismissed, with no substantial question of law arising from the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 138 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13231</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of 100% depreciation claims on leased bottles, concluding the transactions were financial arrangements, not genuine leases. It acted within its jurisdiction under Section 254(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to examine lease deeds and ascertain the true nature of transactions. The appeal was dismissed, with no substantial question of law arising from the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>