https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273088 A land acquisition notification issued under Section 4(1) in the name of a deceased recorded owner was treated as invalid because the objection had already disclosed the owner's death and identified the legal heir, yet the defect was not corrected in the later declaration under Section 6. A notification against a dead person is a nullity, and acquisition proceedings founded on such a notification cannot be sustained. The Madras HC therefore quashed the Section 4(1) notification and upheld the challenge. en-us Sat, 17 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jun 2018 16:58:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273088 A land acquisition notification issued under Section 4(1) in the name of a deceased recorded owner was treated as invalid because the objection had already disclosed the owner's death and identified the legal heir, yet the defect was not corrected in the later declaration under Section 6. A notification against a dead person is a nullity, and acquisition proceedings founded on such a notification cannot be sustained. The Madras HC therefore quashed the Section 4(1) notification and upheld the challenge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 17 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273088