https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273085 Order VIII Rule 6A permits a counter claim to be treated as a cross-suit when properly pleaded within the prescribed stage of defence, and the note states that such a claim may be decreed if not excluded by the plaintiff and otherwise proved. It also notes that Section 73 of the Evidence Act allows the court to compare disputed signatures with admitted signatures, while the party relying on contested documents must prove execution and the alleged payments. The text further records that earlier final findings and documentary admissions can operate as estoppel and finality, and that concurrent factual findings will not be disturbed in second appeal absent a substantial question of law. en-us Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jun 2018 10:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273085 Order VIII Rule 6A permits a counter claim to be treated as a cross-suit when properly pleaded within the prescribed stage of defence, and the note states that such a claim may be decreed if not excluded by the plaintiff and otherwise proved. It also notes that Section 73 of the Evidence Act allows the court to compare disputed signatures with admitted signatures, while the party relying on contested documents must prove execution and the alleged payments. The text further records that earlier final findings and documentary admissions can operate as estoppel and finality, and that concurrent factual findings will not be disturbed in second appeal absent a substantial question of law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273085