<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 98 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361271</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act was not validly served as it was sent to an incorrect address, rendering the service invalid. The presumption of service was deemed inapplicable, leading to a decision in favor of the assessee. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and the reassessment proceedings were invalidated due to improper notice service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2018 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 98 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361271</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act was not validly served as it was sent to an incorrect address, rendering the service invalid. The presumption of service was deemed inapplicable, leading to a decision in favor of the assessee. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and the reassessment proceedings were invalidated due to improper notice service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>