<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 97 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361270</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing due to health issues and admitting it for adjudication. Regarding the disallowance of purchases, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order, finding the purchases genuine and not involving hawala transactions. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to apply a gross profit rate of 4% and concluded that the total addition to the assessee&#039;s income was not justified. The decision was made on 31st May 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 07:14:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 97 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361270</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing due to health issues and admitting it for adjudication. Regarding the disallowance of purchases, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order, finding the purchases genuine and not involving hawala transactions. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to apply a gross profit rate of 4% and concluded that the total addition to the assessee&#039;s income was not justified. The decision was made on 31st May 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>