<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 94 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13226</link>
    <description>The court declined to issue a writ of mandamus as requested by the petitioner, stating that it is not appropriate for the judiciary to interfere in matters of legislative policy regarding tax concessions. The petitioner was advised to pursue the matter with relevant authorities or functionaries to address any anomalies in claiming benefits under the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 13:44:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 94 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13226</link>
      <description>The court declined to issue a writ of mandamus as requested by the petitioner, stating that it is not appropriate for the judiciary to interfere in matters of legislative policy regarding tax concessions. The petitioner was advised to pursue the matter with relevant authorities or functionaries to address any anomalies in claiming benefits under the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>