<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 84 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361257</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ordering the release of imported goods without redemption fine and penalty. However, ground rent detention charges were demanded. The Court directed respondent No.2 to decide on the relief claimed within one month, emphasizing compliance with the law and affording the petitioner an opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2018 23:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 84 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361257</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ordering the release of imported goods without redemption fine and penalty. However, ground rent detention charges were demanded. The Court directed respondent No.2 to decide on the relief claimed within one month, emphasizing compliance with the law and affording the petitioner an opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>