<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 83 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361256</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the time-barred decision regarding a challenge to a time-barred appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding a refund of Additional Duty of Custom (SAD) sanctioned by the Assistant Commissioner. The matter was remanded for merit-based orders, clarifying the interpretation of the time limit for filing appeals and emphasizing the exclusion of time spent pursuing redressal with relevant authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 83 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361256</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the time-barred decision regarding a challenge to a time-barred appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding a refund of Additional Duty of Custom (SAD) sanctioned by the Assistant Commissioner. The matter was remanded for merit-based orders, clarifying the interpretation of the time limit for filing appeals and emphasizing the exclusion of time spent pursuing redressal with relevant authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>