<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 82 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361255</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. 10,00,000 imposed on a Customs House Agent (CHA) for his involvement in fraudulent export activities, including overvaluation of exports to claim ineligible benefits. Despite the CHA&#039;s denial of conspiracy involvement, his admission of receiving duty drawbacks and knowledge of irregular export practices led to the tribunal affirming his complicity. The tribunal emphasized the CHA&#039;s obligations under Customs regulations and concluded that his actions violated regulatory requirements, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal and the penalty being upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 82 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361255</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. 10,00,000 imposed on a Customs House Agent (CHA) for his involvement in fraudulent export activities, including overvaluation of exports to claim ineligible benefits. Despite the CHA&#039;s denial of conspiracy involvement, his admission of receiving duty drawbacks and knowledge of irregular export practices led to the tribunal affirming his complicity. The tribunal emphasized the CHA&#039;s obligations under Customs regulations and concluded that his actions violated regulatory requirements, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal and the penalty being upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>