<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 80 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361253</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The penalty under Section 78 was set aside as the appellant had paid the tax before the show cause notice, with no evidence of fraud. The Service Tax liability for flats sold pre-completion certificate was upheld, while the demand for subsequent sales was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 80 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361253</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The penalty under Section 78 was set aside as the appellant had paid the tax before the show cause notice, with no evidence of fraud. The Service Tax liability for flats sold pre-completion certificate was upheld, while the demand for subsequent sales was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>