<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1445 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273081</link>
    <description>ITAT (Mumbai, AT) directed the AO/TPO to re-determine arm&#039;s-length price after excluding comparables whose turnover exceeds about 20 times that of the assessee (companies with turnover over Rs.20 crore) and those functionally dissimilar (software-development firms vs. information-technology/network-support provider). The tribunal also held that e-connectivity charges paid by the assessee are revenue in nature, not capital, and should be treated as revenue expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1445 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273081</link>
      <description>ITAT (Mumbai, AT) directed the AO/TPO to re-determine arm&#039;s-length price after excluding comparables whose turnover exceeds about 20 times that of the assessee (companies with turnover over Rs.20 crore) and those functionally dissimilar (software-development firms vs. information-technology/network-support provider). The tribunal also held that e-connectivity charges paid by the assessee are revenue in nature, not capital, and should be treated as revenue expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>