<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1328 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273074</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It held that no penalty is imposable on estimated additions sustained on an ad hoc basis, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence for inaccurate particulars or deliberate concealment. The decision highlighted the importance of accurate details in the return and clarified that not every incorrect claim warrants penalty under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2018 13:25:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1328 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273074</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It held that no penalty is imposable on estimated additions sustained on an ad hoc basis, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence for inaccurate particulars or deliberate concealment. The decision highlighted the importance of accurate details in the return and clarified that not every incorrect claim warrants penalty under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>