<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 69 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361242</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on legal principles and precedents, overturning the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer for unverifiable purchases and accommodation entries. The ITAT considered past cases from the Jaipur bench where similar penalties were deleted, leading to the conclusion that the penalty in this case was unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2018 13:12:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 69 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361242</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on legal principles and precedents, overturning the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer for unverifiable purchases and accommodation entries. The ITAT considered past cases from the Jaipur bench where similar penalties were deleted, leading to the conclusion that the penalty in this case was unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>