<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 64 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361237</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the balance tax credit for the adjustment of seized cash against advance tax liability for Assessment Year 2012-13. The Tribunal emphasized the assessee&#039;s entitlement to such adjustment and ruled that no interest should be charged under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C, as the Department held the seized cash in its custody.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2018 13:04:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 64 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361237</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the balance tax credit for the adjustment of seized cash against advance tax liability for Assessment Year 2012-13. The Tribunal emphasized the assessee&#039;s entitlement to such adjustment and ruled that no interest should be charged under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C, as the Department held the seized cash in its custody.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>