<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 53 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361226</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made under Section 40A(3). The judgment emphasized compliance with the Income Tax Act provisions and the relevance of judicial precedents in tax liability determinations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 53 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361226</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made under Section 40A(3). The judgment emphasized compliance with the Income Tax Act provisions and the relevance of judicial precedents in tax liability determinations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>