<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 43 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361216</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the demand of interest was unsustainable as the credit had been reversed before utilization. The Court also found that the imposition of penalty was unwarranted due to the lack of evidence showing intention to evade duty. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 43 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361216</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the demand of interest was unsustainable as the credit had been reversed before utilization. The Court also found that the imposition of penalty was unwarranted due to the lack of evidence showing intention to evade duty. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>