https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361215 The tribunal partly allowed and partly rejected the appellant's appeal regarding the denial of CENVAT credit on various services and items. The denial of credit for works contract services post-amendment was upheld, while credit on certain specific items used for foundation work was partially allowed. The denial of credit on renting immovable property was overturned, and credit on liaison services, labor charges, and consultancy services was supported. The denial of credit on security services due to factory closure was also overturned. The tribunal directed the appellant to reverse/pay the denied credit amounts with interest but deemed the penalty unwarranted. en-us Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jun 2018 11:58:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361215 The tribunal partly allowed and partly rejected the appellant's appeal regarding the denial of CENVAT credit on various services and items. The denial of credit for works contract services post-amendment was upheld, while credit on certain specific items used for foundation work was partially allowed. The denial of credit on renting immovable property was overturned, and credit on liaison services, labor charges, and consultancy services was supported. The denial of credit on security services due to factory closure was also overturned. The tribunal directed the appellant to reverse/pay the denied credit amounts with interest but deemed the penalty unwarranted. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361215