<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 41 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361214</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the appellant was not liable for any further penalty. The tribunal determined that the appellant had complied with the penalty payment requirements by paying 25% of the penalty amount within the specified timeframe, thereby clarifying the applicability of reduced penalties under Section 11AC(1)(b) in cases involving penalty imposition under Rule 15(1) of the CENVAT Credit Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 41 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361214</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the appellant was not liable for any further penalty. The tribunal determined that the appellant had complied with the penalty payment requirements by paying 25% of the penalty amount within the specified timeframe, thereby clarifying the applicability of reduced penalties under Section 11AC(1)(b) in cases involving penalty imposition under Rule 15(1) of the CENVAT Credit Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>