https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273062 The case involved proceedings for the recovery of duty on goods lost in floods by M/s Arofine Chemical Industries. The duty demand was confirmed, and the appellate authority upheld it. The appellant sought remission of duty on finished goods, citing legal precedents. The tribunal found the demand premature as remission was pending. The matter was remanded for re-computation of duty liability on finished goods not covered by remission. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for computation of any duty liability on finished goods. The judgment emphasizes due process in duty recovery cases. en-us Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jun 2018 11:36:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273062 The case involved proceedings for the recovery of duty on goods lost in floods by M/s Arofine Chemical Industries. The duty demand was confirmed, and the appellate authority upheld it. The appellant sought remission of duty on finished goods, citing legal precedents. The tribunal found the demand premature as remission was pending. The matter was remanded for re-computation of duty liability on finished goods not covered by remission. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for computation of any duty liability on finished goods. The judgment emphasizes due process in duty recovery cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273062