https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273039 Interference with devotees' right to worship in a temple was treated as a civil dispute because the claim concerned a legally protected civil right, not merely ritual preference, and the civil court had jurisdiction. The established right of the Digamber sect to worship according to its tenets was upheld on the existing findings, and the appellants were not entitled to alter the idol or temple by placing Chakshus, Dhwajadand, Kalash or locks so as to obstruct that worship. Refusal to receive additional evidence was justified, and the limited morning worship arrangement was regarded as a reasonable accommodation that did not prejudice either sect. en-us Thu, 26 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Jun 2018 15:19:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273039 Interference with devotees' right to worship in a temple was treated as a civil dispute because the claim concerned a legally protected civil right, not merely ritual preference, and the civil court had jurisdiction. The established right of the Digamber sect to worship according to its tenets was upheld on the existing findings, and the appellants were not entitled to alter the idol or temple by placing Chakshus, Dhwajadand, Kalash or locks so as to obstruct that worship. Refusal to receive additional evidence was justified, and the limited morning worship arrangement was regarded as a reasonable accommodation that did not prejudice either sect. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273039