https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361207 The court granted a stay of recovery of demands by coercive steps for Assessment Years 2009-2010, 2013-2014, and 2014-2015, subject to the petitioner depositing a portion of the disputed tax amount. The petitioner disputed the finding of a permanent establishment in India by Mitsui & Co. Ltd., Japan, citing tribunal decisions and high sea sales. The delay in appeal decisions by the CIT(A) was highlighted as a concern. The court directed the filing of a counter-affidavit and allowed for a rejoinder, emphasizing the need for thorough consideration of arguments. The pendency of a writ petition would not impede the CIT(A) from deciding on pending appeals. en-us Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 May 2018 16:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361207 The court granted a stay of recovery of demands by coercive steps for Assessment Years 2009-2010, 2013-2014, and 2014-2015, subject to the petitioner depositing a portion of the disputed tax amount. The petitioner disputed the finding of a permanent establishment in India by Mitsui & Co. Ltd., Japan, citing tribunal decisions and high sea sales. The delay in appeal decisions by the CIT(A) was highlighted as a concern. The court directed the filing of a counter-affidavit and allowed for a rejoinder, emphasizing the need for thorough consideration of arguments. The pendency of a writ petition would not impede the CIT(A) from deciding on pending appeals. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361207