<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 32 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361205</link>
    <description>The Tribunal deemed the reassessment proceedings invalid as the Assessing Officer lacked new tangible material and deviated from the principle of consistency. The reclassification of interest income and the addition of the provision for doubtful debts were found unjustified. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the reassessment order was overturned, emphasizing the seriousness of reassessment actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 32 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361205</link>
      <description>The Tribunal deemed the reassessment proceedings invalid as the Assessing Officer lacked new tangible material and deviated from the principle of consistency. The reclassification of interest income and the addition of the provision for doubtful debts were found unjustified. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the reassessment order was overturned, emphasizing the seriousness of reassessment actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>