<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 19 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361192</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of as the penalty imposed on National Paper Agency was deemed unenforceable under the proprietorship of Ms. Binal Damji Boricha. The Tribunal clarified that the penalty should be enforced against the actual importers who fraudulently used the deceased proprietor&#039;s details. The appeal became infructuous, emphasizing the significance of legal identity and proprietorship distinctions in determining liability in cases involving fraudulent imports.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 19 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361192</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of as the penalty imposed on National Paper Agency was deemed unenforceable under the proprietorship of Ms. Binal Damji Boricha. The Tribunal clarified that the penalty should be enforced against the actual importers who fraudulently used the deceased proprietor&#039;s details. The appeal became infructuous, emphasizing the significance of legal identity and proprietorship distinctions in determining liability in cases involving fraudulent imports.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>