<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 14 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361187</link>
    <description>Statutory appellate remedies under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act ordinarily preclude writ challenges to attachment, possession-related action and summons where parties can approach the Appellate Tribunal and, thereafter, the High Court. Notice before attachment and an opportunity to object before confirmation satisfy natural justice requirements. The prospective-inclusion contention concerning the scheduled Prevention of Corruption Act offence did not invalidate the enforcement action in these circumstances. Challenges to investigation summons are premature until the summoned persons appear and participate. The writ petitions were rejected for availability of an effective alternative remedy and on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 15:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 14 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361187</link>
      <description>Statutory appellate remedies under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act ordinarily preclude writ challenges to attachment, possession-related action and summons where parties can approach the Appellate Tribunal and, thereafter, the High Court. Notice before attachment and an opportunity to object before confirmation satisfy natural justice requirements. The prospective-inclusion contention concerning the scheduled Prevention of Corruption Act offence did not invalidate the enforcement action in these circumstances. Challenges to investigation summons are premature until the summoned persons appear and participate. The writ petitions were rejected for availability of an effective alternative remedy and on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>