https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361186 Property inherited by a Hindu male from his father in 1943 retained the character of HUF/coparcenary property, so descendants acquired rights by birth. The Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 did not change that character merely because the land was recorded as bhumidari land. A karta could validly transfer such property only for legal necessity or benefit of estate, and no such necessity was shown. The sale deeds executed in favour of family members were therefore without authority and invalid. en-us Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 May 2018 17:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361186 Property inherited by a Hindu male from his father in 1943 retained the character of HUF/coparcenary property, so descendants acquired rights by birth. The Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 did not change that character merely because the land was recorded as bhumidari land. A karta could validly transfer such property only for legal necessity or benefit of estate, and no such necessity was shown. The sale deeds executed in favour of family members were therefore without authority and invalid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361186