<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 11 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361184</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s miscellaneous application for a change of cause title was allowed, altering the jurisdiction and address. The case involved a service tax dispute related to renting immovable property, resulting in a liability of Rs. 7,11,745. The appellant remitted Rs. 5,48,664 after audit officers identified the liability. Despite the Revenue&#039;s show-cause notice and penalties, the appellant&#039;s appeal to the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals-I) was unsuccessful. The forum directed a review of interest computation and set aside penalties under Section 76 &amp;amp; 77, citing the appellant&#039;s pre-notice tax payment and lack of contestation as reasonable causes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 16:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 11 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361184</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s miscellaneous application for a change of cause title was allowed, altering the jurisdiction and address. The case involved a service tax dispute related to renting immovable property, resulting in a liability of Rs. 7,11,745. The appellant remitted Rs. 5,48,664 after audit officers identified the liability. Despite the Revenue&#039;s show-cause notice and penalties, the appellant&#039;s appeal to the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals-I) was unsuccessful. The forum directed a review of interest computation and set aside penalties under Section 76 &amp;amp; 77, citing the appellant&#039;s pre-notice tax payment and lack of contestation as reasonable causes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>