https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361183 The appeal was partly allowed, setting aside the penalty and demand of service tax for the specified period from 1.10.2003 to 18.4.2006. The Tribunal held that the appellant had discharged the service tax liability for the period after 18.4.2006 before the show cause notice was issued, indicating no mala fide intention to evade tax. Therefore, the appellant was not liable for penalty under Section 78. en-us Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 May 2018 19:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361183 The appeal was partly allowed, setting aside the penalty and demand of service tax for the specified period from 1.10.2003 to 18.4.2006. The Tribunal held that the appellant had discharged the service tax liability for the period after 18.4.2006 before the show cause notice was issued, indicating no mala fide intention to evade tax. Therefore, the appellant was not liable for penalty under Section 78. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361183