<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1128 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273028</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order due to procedural irregularities and the failure to adhere to statutory requirements. The judgment emphasized the necessity of following proper legal procedures and jurisdictional boundaries in refund disallowance cases and the appellate process under the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1128 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273028</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order due to procedural irregularities and the failure to adhere to statutory requirements. The judgment emphasized the necessity of following proper legal procedures and jurisdictional boundaries in refund disallowance cases and the appellate process under the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>