https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13206 The High Court set aside the order under section 269UD(1) of the Income-tax Act, remitting the matter back for fresh consideration in accordance with the apex court's directions in C.B. Gautam's case. The acquisition was deemed non-final, with possession restored to the petitioner. The court emphasized adherence to principles of natural justice and consequences of Revenue's failure to pass an order within the statutory period. en-us Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 May 2009 11:54:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13206 The High Court set aside the order under section 269UD(1) of the Income-tax Act, remitting the matter back for fresh consideration in accordance with the apex court's directions in C.B. Gautam's case. The acquisition was deemed non-final, with possession restored to the petitioner. The court emphasized adherence to principles of natural justice and consequences of Revenue's failure to pass an order within the statutory period. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13206