<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1129 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273033</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the exemption under section 10(23C)(iv) and the treatment of capital expenditure as an application of income, based on the approval granted to the assessee. The decision was supported by legal precedents emphasizing the importance of assessing trust/institution activities and objectives. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose, affirming the decisions of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:35:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1129 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273033</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the exemption under section 10(23C)(iv) and the treatment of capital expenditure as an application of income, based on the approval granted to the assessee. The decision was supported by legal precedents emphasizing the importance of assessing trust/institution activities and objectives. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose, affirming the decisions of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>