<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1943 (9) TMI 12 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273023</link>
    <description>A minor&#039;s share of profits from admission to the benefits of a partnership was includible in the individual assessee&#039;s total income under section 16(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 because the relevant test was the minor&#039;s status during the previous year, not the date of assessment. Since the minor remained a minor throughout that year, inclusion was required. On the firm&#039;s constitution, section 26(1) turned on the position when the firm&#039;s assessment was completed; because the firm had already been assessed before the minor attained majority, the later change did not affect the completed assessment. The Revenue&#039;s view was upheld on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1943 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 15:31:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1943 (9) TMI 12 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273023</link>
      <description>A minor&#039;s share of profits from admission to the benefits of a partnership was includible in the individual assessee&#039;s total income under section 16(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 because the relevant test was the minor&#039;s status during the previous year, not the date of assessment. Since the minor remained a minor throughout that year, inclusion was required. On the firm&#039;s constitution, section 26(1) turned on the position when the firm&#039;s assessment was completed; because the firm had already been assessed before the minor attained majority, the later change did not affect the completed assessment. The Revenue&#039;s view was upheld on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1943 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>