<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1298 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273016</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions and upholding penalties under sections 271E and 271D of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years in question. The Tribunal found the violations to be intentional and persistent, lacking reasonable cause or business justification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 10:49:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1298 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273016</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions and upholding penalties under sections 271E and 271D of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years in question. The Tribunal found the violations to be intentional and persistent, lacking reasonable cause or business justification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>