<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1728 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361164</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2009-2010. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for clarity in penalty notices and conclusive findings to support penalty imposition. Citing legal provisions and judicial interpretations, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, reaffirming the significance of adherence to legal requirements in penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1728 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361164</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2009-2010. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for clarity in penalty notices and conclusive findings to support penalty imposition. Citing legal provisions and judicial interpretations, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, reaffirming the significance of adherence to legal requirements in penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>