<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1725 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361161</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, emphasizing that the mere acceptance of additions and payment of tax without evidence of concealment does not warrant penalty imposition under section 271(1)(c). The decision was based on legal principles and precedents, ensuring fairness and adherence to procedural requirements. The penalties imposed by lower authorities for the assessment year 2009-2010 were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 16:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1725 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361161</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, emphasizing that the mere acceptance of additions and payment of tax without evidence of concealment does not warrant penalty imposition under section 271(1)(c). The decision was based on legal principles and precedents, ensuring fairness and adherence to procedural requirements. The penalties imposed by lower authorities for the assessment year 2009-2010 were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>