<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1723 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361159</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer under section 50C of the Income Tax Act. It emphasized that failure to refer the matter to the valuation authority as requested renders the assessment order invalid. The Tribunal cited legal precedents and stressed the importance of following proper procedures for fair valuation practices in determining capital gains. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the addition by the Ld. CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1723 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361159</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer under section 50C of the Income Tax Act. It emphasized that failure to refer the matter to the valuation authority as requested renders the assessment order invalid. The Tribunal cited legal precedents and stressed the importance of following proper procedures for fair valuation practices in determining capital gains. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the addition by the Ld. CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>