<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 155 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13199</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for claims of Rs. 1,83,492/- and Rs. 1,00,112/-. It found the first claim was based on a bona fide belief and the second was a bona fide mistake. The Tribunal&#039;s findings were upheld, confirming no conscious concealment or inaccurate particulars. The reference was answered without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 155 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13199</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for claims of Rs. 1,83,492/- and Rs. 1,00,112/-. It found the first claim was based on a bona fide belief and the second was a bona fide mistake. The Tribunal&#039;s findings were upheld, confirming no conscious concealment or inaccurate particulars. The reference was answered without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>