https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273002 The court determined that the partnership was a partnership at will and was validly dissolved on 18th December 1956 by the notice given by the plaintiff. The trial court's decision to pass a preliminary decree based on this dissolution date was upheld. The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the appeal to the respondents in three separate sets, with no costs awarded to respondent No. 5, who supported the appellant. en-us Wed, 31 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 May 2018 15:09:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273002 The court determined that the partnership was a partnership at will and was validly dissolved on 18th December 1956 by the notice given by the plaintiff. The trial court's decision to pass a preliminary decree based on this dissolution date was upheld. The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the appeal to the respondents in three separate sets, with no costs awarded to respondent No. 5, who supported the appellant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273002