<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (2) TMI 68 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273003</link>
    <description>Novation of an earlier partnership debt requires both the reconstituted firm&#039;s assumption of liability and the creditor&#039;s assent to accept that firm in substitution for the former firm. Conduct, correspondence, treatment of the debt as a firm obligation, and payments may establish those elements. Partnership status may be proved through agreement and conduct, including participation in business, receipt of accounts, and correspondence as a partner. Documentary records, accounts, admissions, and witness evidence may prove deposits and payment endorsements. Acknowledgments and part-payments made by a partner in the course of firm business can extend limitation against all partners. Territorial jurisdiction depends on the applicable civil-suit jurisdiction rule.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 15:09:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (2) TMI 68 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273003</link>
      <description>Novation of an earlier partnership debt requires both the reconstituted firm&#039;s assumption of liability and the creditor&#039;s assent to accept that firm in substitution for the former firm. Conduct, correspondence, treatment of the debt as a firm obligation, and payments may establish those elements. Partnership status may be proved through agreement and conduct, including participation in business, receipt of accounts, and correspondence as a partner. Documentary records, accounts, admissions, and witness evidence may prove deposits and payment endorsements. Acknowledgments and part-payments made by a partner in the course of firm business can extend limitation against all partners. Territorial jurisdiction depends on the applicable civil-suit jurisdiction rule.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>