<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1699 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361135</link>
    <description>The Court found that the returns filed by the petitioner were wrongly declared invalid by the Income Tax Department. The rejection of the application without a hearing was deemed improper. The Court directed the Department to scrutinize the returns and pass appropriate orders, including any entitlement to a refund, within a specified period. The petitioner agreed not to raise objections on the limitation aspect if assessment proceedings were required to be completed. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition by quashing the challenged communications and ordering the Department to scrutinize the returns within a specified timeframe and pass appropriate orders accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1699 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361135</link>
      <description>The Court found that the returns filed by the petitioner were wrongly declared invalid by the Income Tax Department. The rejection of the application without a hearing was deemed improper. The Court directed the Department to scrutinize the returns and pass appropriate orders, including any entitlement to a refund, within a specified period. The petitioner agreed not to raise objections on the limitation aspect if assessment proceedings were required to be completed. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition by quashing the challenged communications and ordering the Department to scrutinize the returns within a specified timeframe and pass appropriate orders accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>