https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273000 For Article 133, a High Court decree must be tested as a whole against the decree of the court below as a whole, not only against the portion the appellant seeks to challenge. If the High Court varies any part of the trial court decree, the appellate decree is not one of pure affirmance even where other issues remain undisturbed. The distinction between an appeal and a cross-objection was treated as immaterial where only one composite decree was drawn up. On that basis, the applicant was held to have a right of appeal as of right, and leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was granted. en-us Fri, 14 Mar 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 May 2018 12:34:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273000 For Article 133, a High Court decree must be tested as a whole against the decree of the court below as a whole, not only against the portion the appellant seeks to challenge. If the High Court varies any part of the trial court decree, the appellate decree is not one of pure affirmance even where other issues remain undisturbed. The distinction between an appeal and a cross-objection was treated as immaterial where only one composite decree was drawn up. On that basis, the applicant was held to have a right of appeal as of right, and leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Mar 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273000