https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272998 Compliance with the statutory draft-and-objection procedure under Section 43(1)(iii) satisfied the requirements of notice, hearing and consultation, as the affected operators had filed objections and were represented before the Home Secretary and State Transport Authority. The challenge for want of procedural fairness therefore failed. In the context of the special scheme for nationalised routes and displaced operators, the State Government's directions were administrative, and permits issued in obedience to those directions were ministerial acts. The ordinary Chapter IV procedure for fresh permits was accordingly unnecessary, so the impugned notification and consequential permits were upheld. en-us Wed, 31 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 May 2018 11:40:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272998 Compliance with the statutory draft-and-objection procedure under Section 43(1)(iii) satisfied the requirements of notice, hearing and consultation, as the affected operators had filed objections and were represented before the Home Secretary and State Transport Authority. The challenge for want of procedural fairness therefore failed. In the context of the special scheme for nationalised routes and displaced operators, the State Government's directions were administrative, and permits issued in obedience to those directions were ministerial acts. The ordinary Chapter IV procedure for fresh permits was accordingly unnecessary, so the impugned notification and consequential permits were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272998