<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1678 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361114</link>
    <description>The appellant is liable to pay the full service tax for the extended period along with interest and is also liable for a penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, except for the service tax on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services. The appeal is partially allowed by setting aside the demand of service tax under GTA along with corresponding interest and penalty. The remaining part of the Order-in-Appeal is upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1678 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361114</link>
      <description>The appellant is liable to pay the full service tax for the extended period along with interest and is also liable for a penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, except for the service tax on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services. The appeal is partially allowed by setting aside the demand of service tax under GTA along with corresponding interest and penalty. The remaining part of the Order-in-Appeal is upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>