<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1677 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361113</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was entitled to interest on the refund of the pre-deposit under Section 35FF of the Central Excise Act. The decision highlighted the mandatory nature of paying interest on delayed refunds, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions and legal precedents in determining entitlement to interest on refunds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 19:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1677 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361113</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was entitled to interest on the refund of the pre-deposit under Section 35FF of the Central Excise Act. The decision highlighted the mandatory nature of paying interest on delayed refunds, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions and legal precedents in determining entitlement to interest on refunds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>