<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 143 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13186</link>
    <description>Penalty proceedings under section 271B are not required to be initiated simultaneously with assessment proceedings, because the provision does not make contemporaneous initiation a condition for valid action. The distinction applied in cases under section 271(1), where satisfaction must arise in the course of proceedings, was held not to govern section 271B. A notice for penalty may therefore follow completion of assessment if issued within the limitation period under section 275. On the facts, initiation was timely and the assessee&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:22:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 143 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13186</link>
      <description>Penalty proceedings under section 271B are not required to be initiated simultaneously with assessment proceedings, because the provision does not make contemporaneous initiation a condition for valid action. The distinction applied in cases under section 271(1), where satisfaction must arise in the course of proceedings, was held not to govern section 271B. A notice for penalty may therefore follow completion of assessment if issued within the limitation period under section 275. On the facts, initiation was timely and the assessee&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>