<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1664 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361100</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remands both appeals for further examination on the issue of unjust enrichment before granting the refund. The appellant&#039;s entitlement to the refund is acknowledged, but the Tribunal emphasizes the need to assess whether the duty incidence has been passed on to any other party, highlighting the importance of establishing unjust enrichment in both cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 10:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1664 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361100</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remands both appeals for further examination on the issue of unjust enrichment before granting the refund. The appellant&#039;s entitlement to the refund is acknowledged, but the Tribunal emphasizes the need to assess whether the duty incidence has been passed on to any other party, highlighting the importance of establishing unjust enrichment in both cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>